258
نہ کر
" been in the nature of an
despected
d ownership,
Wong
case with
av
Nei Che
was the
Cheung, it will,
I kick, be recognised that the Government should not re-occupy weept whow the terms of making "full compensation in the
tr
way
provided by the reservation for that
#
purpose in Arown leases. On the
& hand, where the occupation.
has been
trespass, and the
$
granting of
tx
leave is a mere
"matter of grace, any
-
conditions
which the Government like to
ویر
impose would be fair, while –·
between these two extremes there. will be
many cases in which it
" will be right to make modified "conditions.
I can of course take
"the opinion of the Board on the Wong si Cheung leaves if torer Excellency still devires it, but I
"think
کا ہو
think
you
will
4
see that the.
estion has already been conwinterca " and settled by the persons best
K
qualified to form an
opinion
z, the Commission who heard "the evidence of the villagers.
y
As regards future. which will come for hearing
" before the Board Your Resecttency
#
"will see that section 10 of
the
"Squatter's Ordinance / Nr. 27 of 1890)
enables the Board to annex any
#
"condition to a lease it i
may
phuck
the
4
fit. This was inserted for
express purpose of enabling the
Board to recommend the invertion
of
condition for repurchave in "cases when it was
نوگر
thought that
" the land might be required by
#
#
the Govern
ment for future purposes. Where the land is
required for present purposes section
12 enables the Governor to refuve
#
to
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.